道德悖論（Moral Paradox）
Moral Paradox
道德悖論是道德現象世界中的一種特殊矛盾，是一種出現在行為選擇中的結果，這個結果具有善惡絕對對立和對抗性質的自相矛盾。在行為的選擇合適實現過程中，善惡對立在結果中的表現。
The moral paradox is a particular contradiction in the moral reality world. It is an outcome of behavioral choices that have an absolute confrontation of good and evil and a contradiction of resistance. In the choice of behavior, good and evil appear in the outcome.
1、形式邏輯悖論
1. The formal logic paradox
違反了形式邏輯規則而導致的思維混亂。在特定的語境下，概念的內涵和外延不一致產生的矛盾現象。
In a particular context, there are contradictions in the content and reach of the concept.
2、辯證法意義上的矛盾
2, 反映的是事物內部包含的相互依存和相互依賴、在一定條件下又可以相互轉化。
This is a reflection of the interdependence and interdependence inherent in things, which can be translated into one another under certain conditions. 3、實踐或行為邏輯
3. The logic of actuality or conduct 一般的定義是：主體在進行價值選擇和實現過程中所必然產生的矛盾，使得行為中同時出現善惡兩種結果並存現象。
The general definition is that the inherent contradiction between the main body 'a href="https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E4%BB %B7%E5%80% of BC 'value= 'value' values results in both good and evil results at the same time. 學雷鋒問題
♪ b' Learn the thunderbolt question ♪ ♪ b' b' ♪ 過去在學雷鋒宣傳時，經常有這樣的報導：一位學雷鋒者在為附近群眾免費修理鍋碗瓢盆，於是在他前面排起了長龍。
In the past, there have been frequent reports of a thunderbolt learner fixing pots and pans for the nearby crowds for free, and a long dragon in front of him. 報導的目的是宣傳學雷鋒的好心人，如果沒有長隊，宣傳就沒有任何效果。值得思考的是：排隊等候的人完全不是來學雷鋒的，而是專門來揀小便宜的。因此，培養一個學雷鋒的人就同時造就出幾十個或更多的貪小便宜的人。以為這樣可以改進社會風氣實在是極大的誤解。——茅於軾：《中國人的道德化前景》
The purpose of the story is to spread awareness about the good people who learn thunderbolts, and without a big team, it's not going to work. It's worth thinking: those who wait in line are not here to learn thunderbolts at all, but to take advantage of them. Thus, those who raise thunderbolts at the same time create a few dozen or more greedy and cheap people. It's a big misunderstanding to think that they can change the social climate. 救助弱勢群體問題
救助弱勢群體的善舉，在產生善果的同時也可能會在兩個方向上造就惡果：可能救助了不該救助的懶漢、懦夫，使之不勞而獲；可能誘發不勞而獲的依賴思想。
The good that rescues the weak may also produce evil in two directions at the same time as the good results are produced: it may save the lazy, cowards who should not be helped, and it may tempt the hard-earned ideas. 救死扶傷問題
Save the Death and Wounded 醫院或醫生在遇到一個身無分文的病人時，該不該救助呢？如果救治的話，費用自己出，這種情況一多，則醫院或醫生無法承受；如果不救，則是不人道的。按照傳統道德觀念，醫生或永遠應該救治；但這種以犧牲一方利益為代價而保全另一方的利益是不能夠作為普遍的道德規則堅持的。
If a hospital or doctor encounters a single patient, it should not be helped. If he or she is treated, , which is more than the hospital or doctor cannot afford; if he or she does not, it is inhuman. Doctors or always should be cured according to traditional moral views; but this sacrifice party is the benefit of preserving the interests of the other side at a price that cannot be maintained as a general ethical rule. 分蘋果問題
Apple > 兩個人分一大一小蘋果。從道德角度看，誰先拿，並拿了小的，就是道德的；另一方就是不道德的。但是先拿的人把善名留給了自己，而把不道德的惡名留給了對方
The two are divided into small apples. Whoever first takes the small one is moral, and the other is immoral. But the first one leaves a good name to himself, leaving an immoral name to the other. 拾金不昧事件
"b) The Gold Treasure incident" 遼寧本溪市一位小學生金妮拾到巨款，還給失主，但是她希望失主能夠送給她一面錦旗。失主安英淑不但沒有這樣做，還振振有詞：錦旗我是不會送的，我一分錢也不給，拾金不昧是中華民族的傳統美德，如果她不還給我就是犯法，我可以告她。
Ginny, a young student in Yongning Creek, picked up the money and gave it back to her, but she hoped that the missing man would give her a flag. Not only did he not do it, but he also spoke: I would not give it, I would not give it, I would not give it, I would not give it, I would collect the gold is the traditional virtue of the Chinese people, and if she did not give it back, I could sue her if she did not do it.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论